Tag: marriage equality

  • Time, to write a wrong.

    Time past righting a wrong, and this my writing of this wrong, in poetic form.

    Marriage Equality.
    Religion’s Organized Refrain.
    You must believe as we, or heathen will you be.
    Don’t confuse the faithful with your lies
    don’t dare to make them open, their dogma shuttered eyes.
    Marriage is a word most meaningful,
    that has but one design,
    its only purpose is fruitful copulation
    with other gendered, of your kind.
    How dare the unbelievers, take our holy word
    and twist, and turn it into something so absurd
    as love between two people,
    without bias for gender,
    Without honor for… our holy word.
    Love, for one of your own gender?
    Absurd!
    For anyone who dares use reason from their own brain
    You must show contempt,
    and haughty disdain.
    ~
    Reason’s Refrain.
    You proclaim your god is mighty, loving, and true,
    then by your deeds prove, his holy words mean nothing, to you.
    Twist the words written, that they might suit just you.
    Who are you to claim protection of the words you hold holy
    when by your efforts, you twist it into something so absurd
    as “love may only exist between those of opposite gender”.
    To thinkers, this obscenity, you dare to tender.
    Only when it suits you, do you quote your holy words.
    Often when it suits you, from context do you rip them,
    and with that deed, remove any true meaning.
    Picking and choosing, without gleaning
    any truth they might once have held.
    Guidance did they offer, words, like shalt… not must.
    Meanings long since forgotten, corrupted by man’s lust.
    Divinity is life, and life, divinity.
    Within our single life, we strive for love.
    We don’t know where we’ll find it,
    spiritually, not body bound, flowing from without.
    Or within the arms, of a mortal lover, maybe not devout.
    True love knows no season,
    true love doesn’t bow before dogmatic reason.
    It clasps you by the heart,
    and when it goes unrequited, it tears your afflicted soul apart.
    You claim you love your brothers, and yet you segregate
    you may not love another, whose gender yours does match.
    If the only purpose of marriage is procreation,
    then sinners are we all, without exemption.
    Marriage is a commitment, an everlasting bond.
    Marriage is not defined, by rigid little laws
    or rigid little people, without true, just, and fair cause.
    Does not marriage within in it hold love?
    Another simple, holy word…
    Love is not subject to reason,
    Love does not flinch before distrust,
    Love does not fail before mis-reason,
    nor bow before the discrimination,
    of this misguided nation
    The only thing, before which love kneels, is the claimer of your heart,
    who love has brought together, let no one tear apart
    ~
    Logic’s Refrain
    No law that is not equal, should be tendered, as true.
    No exceptions should we make
    that  within our laws entomb, foul discrimination.
    As anyone can see, this must be folly
    this, cannot be…
    divinity.
    Any decent person must demand…
    Marriage Equality.
    ~

     {I make no apologies for my changed views on Marriage. If you’re interested in the motivations of a contrary man, you may read my tale of enlightenment here, and here.}

  • Marriage, a word’s meaning.

    Marriage, a wonderful word ~ a worthy institution ~ a question, of meaning…

    Although I never thought anyone had the right to tell another who they can or can’t love,  long did I hold the belief that the word marriage defined a union between a man and a woman. Very recently I was thinking about this and realized that limiting this particular word to a narrow, archaic construct has a major impact on people – my belief that a word should be limiting, placed severe constraints on others.

    Who am I to tell anyone who chooses to make a commitment, that they cannot – simply because the one to whom they commit themselves is of the same gender? I don’t have that right, and if I did… well, I would cast it away.

    In the past, I would have voted for any type of civil union, regardless of its name. Yet, within my heart, I reserved the word marriage for only the variety of union in which I am bound. My way, is not the only right way.

    Now, I must open my closed mind and grant others, different from me, their chance at happiness, their chance at lifelong togetherness. Call it a civil union, call it a marriage, or simply call it by its true name… love.

    While none of us has any right to determine the lie of another’s heart, everyone deserves a chance at completion.  Well done Washington, for taking a leadership role amongst the United States, once more.

    {04/14/13 you can read more of my journey to understand the meaning of marriage, here.}